Sandy is a bright young woman who dropped out of college after a couple of years.  Being a nature girl, she gets a job working on an organic farm and selling the produce at a local farmers's market.

            Sandy is a smoker, which leads to her being constantly nagged to quit by her nature-loving friends.  One day she has an inspiration: why not grow and sell organic tobacco?  She had received a modest inheritance from an uncle and uses it to implement her plan.  After several years of hard work, the business (Ecosmokes, Inc.) becomes a great success.  Many people view organic cigarettes as a safer alterative to ordinary tobacco.

            Fast forward about 30 years.  Sandy has since acquired a partner, Tom (purely in a business sense).  Each of them owns half the stock of Ecosmokes.  Sandy now decides to retire, leaving Tom to manage the business (she remains owner of half the stock and receives half the net income, after payment of expenses and Tom salary).   

            Shortly after retiring, Sandy goes to a lawyer to have an estate plan drawn up.  The lawyer drafts a will that disposes of her personal possessions.  The lawyer also sets up an irrevocable living trust consisting of her half of the stock of Ecosmokes.  It contains a provision that the beneficiary may not anticipate, assign, or encumber her interest in the trust, nor is it subject to any creditor's claim or legal process before being received by the beneficiary. Tom is appointed the trustee, and as trustee he is given the power to retain the Ecosmokes stock.  The trust provides that at the end of each year, the trustee must pay the net income of the trust to Sandy. Finally, it is governed by California law, where Sandy resides.

            Sandy lives several years after creating the trust and receives the income that she was entitled to (approximately $50,000 each year).  Unfortunately, she becomes addicted to gambling.  She manages to wipe out all her assets, forcing her to live off of social security payments and trust distributions.  She borrows money from a friend, Fred, hoping in desperation to win back her losses, but instead she loses all the money she borrowed.

 Question 1.     If Fred sues Sandy for debt, and wins his case, will Fred be able to force the trustee to pay some or all of the trust income to Fred? [about 20% of total essay points]

           Now assume now that Sandy's debt to Fred is somehow paid,  Sandy lives for several more years, but at some point she becomes incompetent and her nephew is appointed to be her conservator (giving him legal power to act on her behalf).  Meanwhile, some recently conducted scientific research suggests that organic tobacco has the same health risks as other tobacco.  Other research suggests that the benefits of organic tobacco over ordinary tobacco are less than Ecosmokes claimed, but that it was at least somewhat healthier.  Whatever the case, the controversy causes the company's profit (and thus, Sandy's income) to gradually drop to less than half what it was before.  The value of the company--the only trust asset--also drops to about half of what it was when the trust was created.

 

Question 2.     The nephew sues Tom on Sandy's behalf, arguing that Tom breached his fiduciary duties by not providing Sandy with enough income.  Is he likely to win, and why?  [about 60% of total essay points]


Sandy dies.  The trust provides that after Sandy's death, the remaining assets of the trust are to be distributed outright to Sandy's heirs (a few nephews and nieces).  The heirs now sue Tom for breach, arguing that Tom should have sold all of the Ecosmokes stock in 2000, after the adverse studies were published and the stock began a long decline.  The court agrees.  In 2000 the stock owned by the trust had a fair market value of $200,000.  At the time of judgment in 2010 the fair market value is $100,000.   The legal rate of interest during these 10 years was 5% per year.  The average trust produced 10% income a year from its investments during this time. 

 

3.         How much should the court award in damages?  This jurisdiction uses simple interest (no compounding). [about 20%]